Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2006 POPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE FALL ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) AND ITS PARASITOIDS IN NORTHWESTERN ARGENTINA
Gabriela Murúa, Jaime Molina-Ochoa, Carlos Coviella
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In order to know the population dynamics of the fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), and its parasitoids in northwestern Argentina, larvae were weekly collected at two different agrological regions (Tafí Viejo, and Vipos) over four years. The relationship between larval and parasitoid populations, climatologic factors, percent of infested plants, parasitoid relative importance index, abundance of the parasitoids, and percent parasitism were estimated. FAW attacked cornfields when the plants achieved V1 and V2 stages. Temperature and rainfall were the climatologic factors that significantly affected pest density, and temperature affected the parasitoid abundance as well. The FAW parasitoids collected were Campoletis grioti (Blanchard), Chelonus insularis (Cresson), Ophion sp. and Archytas spp. (possibly marmoratus and/or incertus). The average parasitism percentage was 39.4% and 15% in T. Viejo and Vipos, respectively. Parasitoid abundance in both regions was similar, but diversity was different possibly relating to the native surrounding vegetation in Vipos. This is the first report of population dynamics of the fall armyworm and its parasitoids in northwestern Argentina.

Introduction

Insects are a dominant component of agricultural ecosystems, and they impact crop yields in many ways. Several species are pests of row and horticultural crops, reducing yields by the transmission of diseases or by direct damage. Other insects are natural enemies of pest species, and can be used as biological control agents for reducing pest organisms. Insects are considered indicators of biodiversity, providing a means of determining the effects of agricultural practices on whole communities or on abundance and dynamics of individual species (LaSalle 1993).

Understanding the factors that influence the distribution and abundance of an insect is a fundamental issue of insect ecology and is a practical concern with insects that cause economic damage (Baskauf 2003). Insect population dynamics have fundamentally different characteristics depending on the strength and form of exogenous (density-independent) vs. endogenous (density-dependent) forces. Many factors affect population abundance such as competition, natural enemies, and resources, but the relative contribution of exogenous and endogenous effects remains an open question for nearly all biological populations (Ylioja et al. 1999).

The fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) was recognized as a destructive pest of many agricultural crops more than 200 years ago (Luginbill 1928). It is an important economic pest of corn, rice, sorghum, peanut, alfalfa, cotton, Sudan grass, soybean, tobacco, oat, wheat, sugarbeet, and diverse pasture grasses such as Bermuda grass, Johnson grass, and others (Sparks 1979; Andrews 1980; Capinera 1999), and it is widely distributed in America. Its distribution extends eastward into the Caribbean, southward to northern Argentina and northern Chile, and northward through Central America, Mexico, the United States, and southern Canada (Andrews 1980).

Because the FAW has a wide distribution, it is subjected to much climatic diversity, namely, temperature, moisture, and soil type. The environmental factors influencing development and survival, as well as genotype, agricultural practices, crop phenology, and plant maturity may contribute to the dynamics of the system in a given locale (Harrison 1984a; Pair et al. 1986; Barfield & Ashley 1987; Simmons 1992; Riggin et al. 1993).

The FAW is the most important corn pest, causing yield losses fluctuating from 17% to 72% in northeastern Argentina (Perdiguero et al. 1967). However, studies related with the population dynamics of FAW in Argentina, and how environmental factors affect this phenomenon were not previously reported in Argentina. Reports related to the relationship between date and damage by FAW in commercial corn in northwestern Argentina have been published by Willink et al. (1993a), Willink et al. (1993b), and Sosa (2002a, b).

FAW has a diverse complex of natural enemies in the Americas and the Caribbean basin (Ashley 1979; Ashley et al. 1982; Molina-Ochoa et al. 2003). In Argentina at least thirteen species of hymenopteran parasitoids and eight dipteran parasitoids are known to attack FAW (Vera et al. 1995; Virla et al. 1999; Murúa et al. 2003; Murúa & Virla, 2004). However, there is a lack of information on the natural distribution of FAW and its parasitoids in northwestern Argentina, as well as the influence of environmental factors on their dynamics. We report the population dynamics of FAW, its parasitoids, and the influence of environmental factors on the dynamics in the northwestern region of Argentina.

Materials and Methods

Sampling Sites

Two agrological regions (Zuccardi & Fadda 1985) of northwestern Argentina were systematically sampled for FAW larvae during the crop-growing part of the year over a period of four years. The two regions were located in the province of Tucumán. The first region was Tafí Viejo (Department of Tafí Viejo), located between the coordinates 26° 44' S, 65° 14' W, and 609 m altitude. This region is part of the Chaco Pampeana Plain, and it is characterized by good availability of soil moisture during the year. The cornfield used for monitoring was seven ha in size and planted with the regional corn variety Leales 23.

The second region was Vipos (Department of Trancas) located at 26° 28' S, 65° 18' W, and 786 m altitude, in the Intermontana of Tapia-Trancas basin. This region is characterized by soil moisture availability only during the rainy part of the year (December-January), and irrigation is usually required. The cornfield sampled at Vipos was ca. 40 ha, and was also planted with the corn variety Leales 23. Other commercial crops grown in the area included corn, soybean, pumpkins, and vegetables. All commercial fields routinely applied insecticides.

Both regions exhibit agrological differences in their hydrological conditions such as rainfall and evapotranspiration. These differences determine the planting date for each region. Corn can be planted during late October at Tafí Viejo, while the planting date at Vipos occurs from late December to early January.

Sampling for FAW larvae was conducted weekly at Tafí Viejo from October 1999 to January 2000 (Year 1), from October to December in 2000 (Year 2), from October to December 2001 (Year 3), and November 2002 to January 2003 (Year 4). In Vipos, the larvae were sampled from January to March in 2000 (Year 1), from October to December in 2000 (Year 2), from October to December 2001 (Year 3), and from January to March in 2003 (Year 4). Insecticides were not applied in any of the fields sampled in this study.

Larval Sampling

FAW larvae were sampled beginning approximately 10-12 d after the date corn plants exhibited two ligulate leaves, and continued until the beginning of the reproductive stage (R1) (Ritchie et al. 1992). The sampling period lasted about five to seven weeks. Fifty corn plants were randomly sampled at each sampling date, and divided in five groups of ten plants. The plants were checked for the presence of FAW eggs, larvae, and/or adults following the methodologies used by Willink et al. (1993a),Willink et al. (1993b), García Roa et al. (1999), and Fernández (2002). The number of corn infested plants was recorded in order to determine the percentage of infested plants (Harrison 1984b).

FAW larvae collected from cornfields were placed in glass vials (12 cm long × 1.5 cm diameter) containing a piece of fresh corn leaf, and were kept in a chamber under controlled conditions at 25 ± 2°C, 70-75% RH, and 14L:10D photoperiod. FAW larvae were then transferred to similar tubes containing 1 cm3 of artificial diet (Osores et al. 1982). The diet vials containing FAW larvae were maintained in the laboratory until the parasitoids had emerged, or until FAW adult emergence (Riggin et al. 1993).

Parasitoid Identification

Parasitoids were recorded and identified by several specialists. Tachinids were identified by Lic. Susana Avalos (Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina), and Campoletis grioti (Blanchard) by Dra. Carolina Berta (Fundación Miguel Lillo, Departamento de Zoología, Entomología, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina). The remaining parasitoids were compared to specimens previously identified by Dr. Luis De Santis (Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina).

Population Variables

The Percent of infested plants (% IP) (Harrison 1984b, Urbaneja García 2000, Diez 2001) was calculated by the following equation:

i0015-4040-89-2-175-e1.gif

The relative importance index (RII) of the parasitoid species allows for an estimation of the species not only considering its abundance but also its occurrence or frequency. In this way, species poorly represented in individual numbers but frequently recovered over a long period can be balanced with numerous species with sporadic occurrence (Remes-Lenicov & Virla 1993; Rueda 1999; Diez 2001). It was calculated by the following formula:

i0015-4040-89-2-175-e2.gif

Frequency (F) is the percent of individuals of certain species in relation to total individuals of all species (Canal Daza 1993; Molina-Ochoa et al. 2001; Molina-Ochoa et al. 2004), and was calculated by using the following formula:

i0015-4040-89-2-175-e3.gif

Percent of parasitism (%P) was calculated according to Van Driesche (1983); Pair et al. (1986), and Crisóstomo-Legaspi et al. (2001), as follows:.

i0015-4040-89-2-175-e4.gif

Statistical Analysis

Percent data were angularly transformed and subjected to analysis with the software Statistics © 5.5 (2000). In order to determine differences between and among FAW and parasitoid collections from the same region and those from different regions, student t tests were performed.

Regression analyses also were performed to determine the relationship between FAW populations and parasitoid abundance with temperature and rainfall (Diez 2001; Schliserman 2001) by a stepwise approach. For the analyses, the mean of low and high temperatures and mean rainfall during the sampling week, and the mean of low and high temperatures and rainfall recorded in the two weeks previous to the sampling date, were used. From these data it was possible to estimate the week in which the environmental factors most affected the FAW populations, and the abundance of FAW parasitoids.

Results and Discusión

The percent of infested plants (%IP) by FAW larvae was higher at Vipos (≅20%) than at Tafí Viejo (5.5%) (t = 0.0001, P < 0.001, df = 75). The annual percentage of infested plants at Tafí Viejo was highest during 2001 (9%), while at Vipos the highest record was during 2000 (71.3%). The %IP during the four year study in Tafí Viejo were 5.8%, 0.1%, 8.9%, and 8.9%. However in Vipos the %IP were 71.3%, 19.7%, 21.3%, and 18.4%. The total percent of infested plants (%TIP) in Tafí Viejo, and Vipos were 5.5, and 30%, respectively. ANOVA revealed significant differences in the number of infested plants among years during the 4-year study in both areas (T. Viejo: F = 106.38; P < 0.001; df = 72, and Vipos: F = 91.46; P < 0.001, df = 74). The results obtained at Tafí Viejo (early planting) and Vipos (late planting) agreed with those previously reported by Willink et al. (1991) for the Tucumán region, and Sosa (2002a) for the North of Santa Fé province. Earlier plantings had lower levels of FAW infestation and damage, a response similar to that reported by Mitchell (1978), and Harrison (1984b) on corn infested by corn earworm and fall armyworm, respectively.

FAW Collection

About 2400 corn plants were examined in Tafí Viejo, and 132 FAW larvae were collected and 52 parasitoids were recovered. The mean number of FAW larvae per 10 plants was 0.58, 0.013, 0.89, and 0.88 during years 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Larvae were collected as early as late September because of the early planting date. FAW larvae were not found in the first phenological stages (one to three ligulate leaves, V1-V3). One larva was recorded in year 2 during the late crop-growing season, when the plants had seven to eight leaves (V7-V8). Overall, years 1 and 3 produced higher densities of FAW larvae during the vegetative stages V3 to V6, similar to what was found by Hernández-Mendoza (1989) in Colima, México. In contrast, higher larval densities were recorded in years 2 and 4 at the end of the vegetative period.

In Vipos, 2750 plants were examined, 540 larvae were collected, and 82 parasitoids were obtained. The mean number of FAW larvae per 10 plants was 2.59, 2.17, 1.25, and 1.83 during years 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. During years 1 and 2, higher larval numbers were recorded in the V1-V3 stages. Larval populations were consistent throughout the vegetative plant phase for the other years. Overall, larval densities diminished with the age of the cornfield, achieving the lowest numbers during the beginning of the corn's reproductive stages. Comparing FAW population fluctuations in both locations during this 4-year study, FAW at Vipos exhibited significantly higher larval numbers (t = 1.99, P < 0.001, df = 72).

FAW and Corn Phenology

FAW infestations displayed a plant age-dependent response at both localities during the 4-year study. Reduced mean larval numbers were related to plant age and development. Mitchell et al. (1974), and Beserra et al. (2002) found that the distribution of FAW larvae and eggs varied according to the phenological stage of the corn. During the early plant stages (V1-V3), first and second instars were predominant, and about one to six larvae per plant were found. During V4 and V6, only one larva was usually recovered per plant. Carvalho & Silveira (1971) found that small and medium larvae would coexist, but the number of larvae per plant decreased as larval size increased. Larval cannibalism, larval mortality from disease or predators, and larval age are possible factors that influence distribution.

FAW and Climatic Factors

In Tafí Viejo a temperature-dependent response was obtained with respect to FAW population abundance [Y = -1.34 + 1.29 log Max 2T° (mean high temperatures recorded in the week previous to the sampling plus mean high temperatures recorded in the second week previous to the sampling) - 0.29 log rainfall 2 (mean rainfall recorded in the week previous to the sampling plus mean rainfall recorded in the second week previous to the sampling)]; n = 30; P < 0.001; R2 = 0.99). Barfield & Ashley (1987) reported that corn phenology and temperature affected larval development, food consumption, and adult female longevity and fecundity, and that developmental times were temperature-dependent and were modified by the stage of corn consumed. However, at Vipos an associated response was observed with rainfall [Y = 3.89 + 0.5 log rainfall 0 (mean rainfall during the sampling week) -0.18 log Max T°0 (means of high temperatures during the sampling week)]; n = 30; P < 0.01; R2 = 0.219). Silvain & Ti-A-Hing (1985) found that the highest populations of FAW moths and larvae were observed during the rainy seasons, and lowest during the dry seasons.

Insect phenology, density, and number of FAW generations are influenced by the climatic conditions in a given region. Climatologic differences between and among localities could explain the phenological differences, and climatologic conditions among years also could explain fluctuations in pest abundance in each area (Dent 1991; Diez 2001).

Parasitoid Species

Considering the diversity of parasitoids reported from the Tucumán area (Vera et al. 1995; Virla et al. 1999; Berta et al. 2000; Murúa et al. 2002; Murúa et al. 2003; Murúa & Virla 2003; Murúa & Virla 2004) few species were recovered in our study. Only two ichneumonids, Campoletis grioti (Blanchard) and Ophion sp., one braconid, Chelonus insularis (Cresson), and possibly one or two species of tachinids, Archytas marmoratus (Town.) and/or A. incertus (Macquart) were found. All species were collected at Vipos (Table 1), and only C. grioti was recovered at Tafí Viejo. Of all parasitoids collected at Vipos, Archytas spp. comprised 38.3%, C. grioti 35.8%, Ch. insularis 22.2%, and Ophion sp. 3.7%. Seasonally, Ophion sp. was collected when corn plants were V4, whereas Archytas spp. and C. grioti were collected at the end of the crop cycle. These results are in agreement with those by Virla et al. (1999) and Vera et al. (1995), who reported C. grioti and Ophion sp., respectively, attacking FAW larvae collected from corn in Argentina. Our results are also in agreement with Molinari & Avalos (1997), who showed that the dipteran parasites attacked the last instars of FAW in Argentina. No differences were determined in the abundance of parasitoids in both locations during the 4-year study (t = 1.36, P = 0.19, df = 38). We speculate that differences in early or late corn planting would not affect the abundance of FAW parasitoids.

Percent Parasitism

Campoletis grioti was the single parasitoid responsible for 39.4% parasitism at Tafí Viejo. In Vipos, overall percent parasitism during the 4-year study was 15%. The tachinid species, C. grioti, Ch. insularis, and Ophion sp. caused 5.7%, 5.4%, 3.3%, and 0.6% of total FAW parasitism, respectively. The highest record of annual parasitism was recorded during year 2 with 10.5% for C. grioti and the dipteran species, but during year 3, C. grioti, and Ch. insularis each caused 8.5% of parasitism (Table 2).

Kogan et al. (1999) mentioned that cultural practices developed in a plot can affect in a positive or negative way the natural enemy populations, increasing or inhibiting the parasitoid colonization in cultivated fields. These practices could also have direct or indirect effects, directly through environment alterations and indirectly affecting the host plant architecture, lack of food, or refuge.

The lack of vegetation surrounding the sampling area in the cornfields at Tafí Viejo could be a reason for the low diversity found. This area was surrounded by lemon groves where insecticide applications are commonly applied. It is known that the presence of spontaneous vegetation associated with the crop results in higher numbers and diversity of natural enemies related to this vegetation (Altieri & Whitcomb 1980; Hoballah et al. 2004).

It is important to consider that C. grioti is a oligophagous parasitoid that attacks different hosts of several genera in the family Noctuidae. Another possible cause for low diversity is early planting in Tafí Viejo that reduces FAW infestation, and damage to cornfields (Willink et al. 1991). Conversely, in Vipos corn is planted later and the fields were surrounded by native vegetation without significant anthropogenic disturbances affecting potential parasitoid refuges. Higher diversity of parasitoids and higher rates of parasitism in Vipos also may be related to a more diverse habitat with more forest, orchards, groves, and pastures near to cornfields (Molina-Ochoa et al. 2001; Hoballah et al. 2004). Overall, the percent parasitism measured in this study was similar to other studies. Berta et al. (2000) reported parasitism ranging between 5.26% and 50% in cornfields with and without insecticide application in the province of Tucumán, respectively. Luchini & Almeida (1980) listed FAW parasitoids occurring in Brazil and considered C. grioti the most important parasitoid causing about 95% parasitism.

Ashley (1986) and Andrews (1988) listed Ch. insularis occurring throughout North America highlighting its role as parasitoid of FAW by showing parasitism of 63% in southern Florida; however, Pantoja & Fuxa (1992), Molina-Ochoa et al. (2001), and Molina-Ochoa et al. (2004) reported lower levels of parasitism by Ch. insularis of about 5% in Puerto Rico and Mexico, respectively. This braconid has the broadest distribution in Latin America and South America (Molina-Ochoa et al. 2003). Lewis & Nordlund (1980) consider this parasitoid an excellent candidate for augmentative release because it can be introduced throughout its overwintering zone. It is capable of early-season colonization, and can be used in direct therapeutic releases on target crops.

The ichneumonid Ophion sp. caused the lowest level of FAW parasitism in Vipos, ranging between 0.8 and 1.3% during the 4-year study. Similar results have been reported by Molina-Ochoa et al. (2001). Gross & Pair (1991) state that Ophion flavidus (Brullé) parasitized 4th, 5th, and 6th instar FAW with equal success, but were minimally successful in completing development on late 6th instars. This parasitoid caused 19.5% of parasitism in June in southern Georgia. Ophion sp. has been reported previously in Argentina (Vera et al. 1995).

Dipteran parasites played an important role in Vipos in the 4-year study, providing high parasitization levels. Archytas marmoratus and /or A. incertus caused levels of parasitization between 2.1%, and 10.5%. The importance of these species in Argentina and other South American countries was emphasized by Molina-Ochoa et al. (2004) based on reports by Molinari & Avalos (1997) and Virla et al. (1999).

Parasitoids and Climatic Factors

Temperature was the most important climatic factor influencing parasitoid populations in both locations. Similar responses of other parasitoids have been reported by Diez (2001), and Schliserman (2001) for the Tucumán region, such as those attacking the fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata (Weid.), Anastrepha fraterculus (Weid.), and citrus leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella (Stainton). The maximum temperature in Tafí Viejo was the most important factor [Y = -1.55 + 1.3 log Max 2T° (mean high temperatures recorded in the week previous to the sampling plus mean high temperatures recorded in the second week previous to the sampling) - 0.3 log rainfall 0 (mean rainfall during the sampling week)]; n = 38; P < 0.001, R2 = 0.99) affecting the parasitoid population fluctuation.

In Vipos minimum temperature was important factor but no climatic factor was a significant variable describing parasitoid populations [Y = 2.62 + 0.387 log T° Min 0 (mean low temperatures during the sampling web) - 0.18 log rainfall 1(mean rainfall recorded in the week previous to the sampling)]; n = 30; P = 0.11; R2 = 0.085). Factors, such as insecticides, farming and cultural practices, and other natural enemies, may be influencing parasitoid populations.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank MSc. Patricia Diez (CRILAR-CONICET, Tucumán, Argentina) and Dr. John J. Hamm (USDA-ARS Crop Protection & Mangement Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793-0748, USA) for critical review of the manuscript. We thank Mr. Rubén Pedraza (Servicio meteorológico del INTA-EEA Famaillá-Tucumán, Argentina) and Ing. César Lamelas (Sección Agrometeorología EEAOC-Tucumán, Argentina) for meteorological data and advice.

References Cited

1.

M. A. Altieri and W. H. Whitcomb . 1980. Weed manipulation for insect pest management in corn. Environ. Management 4:483–489. Google Scholar

2.

K. L. Andrews 1980. The whorlworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, in the Central America and neighboring areas. Florida Entomol 63:456–467. Google Scholar

3.

K. L. Andrews 1988. Latin American research on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Florida Entomol 71:630–653. Google Scholar

4.

T. R. Ashley 1979. Classification and distribution of fall armyworm parasites. Florida Entomol 62:114–123. Google Scholar

5.

T. R. Ashley, V. H. Waddill, E. R. Mitchell, and J. Rye . 1982. Impact of native parasites on the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South Florida and release of the exotic parasite, Eiphosoma vitticole (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Environ. Entomol 11:833–837. Google Scholar

6.

T. R. Ashley 1986. Geographical distribution and parasitization levels for parasitoids of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Florida Entomol 69:516–524. Google Scholar

7.

C. S. Barfield and T. R. Ashley . 1987. Effects of corn phenology and temperature on the life cycle of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Florida Entomol 70:110–116. Google Scholar

8.

S. J. Baskauf 2003. Factors influencing population dynamics of the southwestern corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae): a reassessment. Environ. Entomol 32:915–928. Google Scholar

9.

D. C. Berta, E. Virla, L. Valverde, and M. V. Colomo . 2000. Efecto en el parasitoide Campoletis grioti de un insecticida usado para el control de Spodoptera frugiperda y aportes a la bionomía del parasitoide. Rev. Mane. Integr. Plagas, Turrialba, Costa Rica 57:65–70. Google Scholar

10.

E. B. Beserra, C. T D. Dias, and J. R P. Parra . 2002. Distribution and natural parasitism of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs at different phenological stages of corn. Florida Entomol 85:588–593. Google Scholar

11.

N. A. Canal Daza 1993. Especies de Parasitoides (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) de Moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) em Quatro Locais do Estado do Amazonas. Tesis de Maestría ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brasil. 93 pp. Google Scholar

12.

J. L. Capinera 1999. Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). EENY-098, University of Florida IFAS Extension, 6 pp,  http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/IN255Google Scholar

13.

R. P L. Carvalho and N. S. Silveira . 1971. Observacoes do comportamento de Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lep.-Noctuidae) ao atacar milho em condicoes de campo. En: Resúmenes del I Congreso Larinomaericano de Entomología, Cuzco, Perú. Google Scholar

14.

J. Crisóstomo-Legaspi, J. V. French, A. Garza Zuniga, and B. C. Legaspi Jr . 2001. Population dynamics of the citrus leafminer, Phyllocnistis citrella (Lep.: Gracillariidae), and its natural enemies in Texas and Mexico. Biological Contr 21:84–90. Google Scholar

15.

D. Dent 1991. Natural enemies. pp. 295-372 In Insect Pest Mangement. CAB International, 604 pp. Google Scholar

16.

P. Diez 2001. Estructura del Complejo de Parasitoides (Hymenoptera) de Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lep.: Gracillariidae) Atacando Limoneros en el Departamento Tafí Viejo, Provincia de Tucumán. Tesis de Maestría, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica, Universidad Nacional de La Rioja, Anillaco, La Rioja, Argentina. 100 pp. Google Scholar

17.

J. L. Fernández 2002. Estimación de umbrales económicos para Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lep.: Noctuidae) en el cultivo del maíz. Investigaciones Agrarias: Producción y Protección Vegetales 17:467–474. Google Scholar

18.

F. García Roa, A. T. Mosquera, C. Vargas, and L. Rojas . 1999. Manejo integrado del gusano cogollero del maíz Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E Smith). CORPOICA Bol. Téc. Palmira (Colombia) 7: 8 pp.  Google Scholar

19.

H. R. Gross and S. D. Pair . 1991. Seasonal distribution, response to host developmental stage, and screened-cage, and Archytas marmoratus (Dip.: Tachinidae) and Ophion flavidus (Hym.: Ichneumonidae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (Lep.: Noctuidae). Florida Entomol 74:237–245. Google Scholar

20.

F. P. Harrison 1984a. Observations of the infestation of corn by fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with reference to plant maturity. Florida Entomol 67:333–339. Google Scholar

21.

F. P. Harrison 1984b. The development of an economic injury level for low populations of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in grain corn. Florida Entomol 67:335–339. Google Scholar

22.

J. L. Hernández-Mendoza 1989. Ecopathologie et Degats de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lep: Noctuidae) en Culture de Mais au Mexique (Etat de Colima)-Possibilite de Lutte a l'aide de la Bacterie Entomopathogene Bacillus thuringiensis. These de Doctorat Sciences Biologiques. Universite des Sciences et techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, France. 142 pp. Google Scholar

23.

M. E. Hoballah, T. Degen, D. Bergvinson, A. Savidan, C. Tamo, and T. C J. Turlings . 2004. Occurrence and direct potential of parasitoids and predators of the fall armyworm (Lep.: Noctuidae) on maize in the subtropical lowlands of Mexico. Agric. Forest Entomol 6:83–88. Google Scholar

24.

M. Kogan, D. Gerling, and J. V. Maddox . 1999. Enhancement of biological control in annual agricultural environments. pp. 789-818 In T. Bellows and T. Fisher [eds.], Handbook of Biological Control, Academic Press. Google Scholar

25.

J. La Salle 1993. Parasitic Hymenoptera., biological control and biodiversity. pp. 197-216 In J. LaSalle & I. D. Gauld [eds], Hymenoptera and Biodiversity CAB International, Oxon, UK. Google Scholar

26.

W. J. Lewis and D. A. Nordlund . 1980. Employment of parasitoids and predators for fall armyworm control. Florida Entomol 63:433–438. Google Scholar

27.

F. Luchini and A. A. Almeida . 1980. Parasitas da Spodoptera (Smith y Abbot, 1797) (Lep.: Noctuidae), lagarta do cartucho do milho, encontrado em Ponta Grossa-PR. An. Soc. Entomol.Brasil 9:115–121. Google Scholar

28.

P. Luginbill 1928. The Fall Armyworm. United States Department of Agriculture, Tech. Bul. 34, 91 pp. Google Scholar

29.

E. R. Mitchell, W. W. Copeland, A. N. Sparks, and A. A. Sekul . 1974. Fall armyworm: disruption of pheromone communication with synthetic acetates. Environ. Entomol 3:778–780. Google Scholar

30.

E. R. Mitchell 1978. Relationship of planting date to damage by earworms in commercial sweet corn in north central Florida. Florida Entomol 61:251–255. Google Scholar

31.

J. Molina-Ochoa, J. J. Hamm, R. Lezama-Gutiérrez, M. López-Edwards, M. González-Ramírez, and A. Pescador-Rubio . 2001. A survey of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) parasitoids in the Mexican states of Michoacán, Colima, Jalisco, and Tamaulipas. Florida Entomol 84:31–36. Google Scholar

32.

J. Molina-Ochoa, J. E. Carpenter, E. A. Heinrichs, and J. E. Foster . 2003. Parasitoids and parasites of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the Americas and Caribbean Basin: An inventory. Florida Entomol 86:254–289. Google Scholar

33.

J. Molina-Ochoa, J. E. Carpenter, R. Lezama-Gutiérrez, J. E. Foster, M. González-Ramírez, C. A. Ángel-Sahagún, and J. Farías-Larios . 2004. Natural distribution of hymenopteran parasitoids of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae in Mexico. Florida Entomol 87:461–472. Google Scholar

34.

A. M. Molinari and S. D. Avalos . 1997. Contribución al conocimiento de taquínidos (Diptera) parasitoides de defoliadores (Lepidoptera) del cultivo de la soja. Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argentina 56:131–136. Google Scholar

35.

M. G. Murúa, E. Virla, and P. Fidalgo . 2002. Relevamiento de los parasitoides de Spodoptera frugiperda (Lep., Noctuidae) en distintas zonas maiceras del Noroeste Argentino. En: Resúmenes V Congreso Argentino de Entomología, Buenos Aires, 18 al 22 de Marzo. Google Scholar

36.

M. G. Murúa, P. Fidalgo, and E. Virla . 2003. First record of Trichogramma atopovirilia Otman y Platner (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae), for Argentina, attacking the eggs of Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lep.: Noctuidae) on corn. Vedalia 9-10:25–26. Google Scholar

37.

M. G. Murúa and E. Virla . 2003. Respuesta del parasitoide Campoletis grioti (Blanchard) (Hym.: Ichneumonidae) a diferentes densidades de Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lep.: Noctuidae). En: Resúmenes VIII Jornadas de Ciencias Naturales del Litoral y I Jornadas de Ciencias Naturales del NOA-Salta, 24 al 26 de Septiembre. Google Scholar

38.

M. G. Murúa and E. Virla . 2004. Contribution to the knowledge of the biology of Euplectrus platyhypenae (Hym: Eulophidae), parasitoid of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lep.-Noctuidae) in Argentina. Folia Entomol. Mex 43:171–180. Google Scholar

39.

V. Osores, E. Willink, and V. Costilla . 1982. Cría de Diatraea saccharalis F. en Laboratorio. Boletín de la Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Tucumán 139. 10 pp. Google Scholar

40.

S. D. Pair, J. R. Raulston, A. N. Sparks, and J. K. Westbrook . 1986. Fall armyworm distribution and population dynamics in the Southeastern states. Florida Entomol 69:468–487. Google Scholar

41.

A. Pantoja and J. R. Fuxa . 1992. Prevalence of biotic control agents in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Folia Entomol. Mex 84:79–84. Google Scholar

42.

J. S. Perdiguero, J. M. Barral, and M. V. De Stacul . 1967. Aspectos Biológicos de Plagas de Maíz de la Región Chaqueña. Evaluación de Daño. INTA, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria, Presidencia Roque Saenz Peña. Boletín 46. 30 pp. Google Scholar

43.

A. M. Remes-Lenicov and E. Virla . 1993. Homópteros auquenorrincos asociados al cultivo de trigo en la República Argentina. I. Análisis de la importancia relativa de las especies. Studies Neotrop. Fauna Environ 28:211–222. Google Scholar

44.

T. M. Riggin, K. E. Espelie, B. R. Wiseman, and D. J. Isenhour . 1993. Distribution of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) parasitoids on five corn genotypes in south Georgia. Florida Entomol 76:292–302. Google Scholar

45.

S. W. Ritchie, J. J. Hanway, G. O. Benson, and J. C. Herman . 1992. How a Corn Plant Develops, Special Report No. 48. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Coop. Ext. Serv. Ames, IA, USA. http://www.ag.iastate.edu/departments/agronomy/corngrows.html#. Google Scholar

46.

M. C. Rueda 1999. Contribución al Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad de la Familia Asilidae (Insecta: Diptera) en América del Sur con Especial Referencia a la Tribu Atomosiini Hermann (Subfamilia Laphriinae). Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán. 144 pp. Google Scholar

47.

P. Schliserman 2001. Abundancia Estacional de Himenópteros Parasitoides de Anastrepha fraterculus y Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) en áreas de Bosque Secundario de la Sierra de San Javier, Tucumán. Tesis de Maestría, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica, Universidad Nacional de La Rioja, Anillaco, La Rioja, Argentina. 120 pp. Google Scholar

48.

J. F. Silvain and J. Ti-A-Hing . 1985. Prediction of larval infestation in pasture grasses by Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from estimates of adult abundance. Florida Entomol 68:686–691. Google Scholar

49.

A. M. Simmons 1992. Effects of constant and fluctuating temperatures and humidities on the survival of Spodoptera frugiperda pupae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Florida Entomol 76:333–340. Google Scholar

50.

M. A. Sosa 2002a. Estimación de daño de Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en maíz con infestación natural en tres fechas de siembra en el Noreste Santafesino. INTA, Centro Regional Santa Fé, Información para extensión 70:39–45. Google Scholar

51.

M. A. Sosa 2002b. Daño producido por Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lep.: Noctuidae) sobre el rendimiento del cultivo en maíz en siembra directa, según tiempos de exposición a la plaga. INTA, Centro Regional Santa Fé, Información para extensión 70:46–52. Google Scholar

52.

A. N. Sparks 1979. A review of the biology of the fall armyworm. Florida Entomol 62:82–87. Google Scholar

53.

A. Urbaneja-García 2000. Biología de Cirrospilus sp. Próximo a lyncus (Hym.: Eulophidae), Ectoparasitoide del Minador de las Hojas de los Cítricos, Phyllocnistis citrella Stainton (Lep.: Gracillariidae). Dinámica e Impacto de los Enemigos Naturales del Minador. Tesis Doctoral, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, l, Universidad Nacional Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, España. 150 pp. Google Scholar

54.

R. G. Van Driesche 1983. Meaning of percent parasitism in studies of insect parasitoids. Environ. Entomol 12:1611–1621. Google Scholar

55.

M. L. Vera, L. Valverde, S. B. Popich, and Z. D. Ajmat De Toledo . 1995. Evaluación preliminar de los enemigos naturales de Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en Tucumán, Argentina. Acta Entomol. Chilena 19:135–141. Google Scholar

56.

E. G. Virla, M. V. Colomo, C. Berta, and L. Valverde . 1999. El complejo de los parasitoides del “gusano cogollero” del maíz, Spodoptera frugiperda, en la República Argentina (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Neotrópica 45:3–12. Google Scholar

57.

E. Willink, V. M. Osores, and M. A. Costilla . 1991. El “gusano cogollero” del maíz, Spodoptera frugiperda. pp. 93 In Resúmenes del II Congreso Argentino de Entomología. Córdoba, Argentina 3-6 de Diciembre de 1991. Google Scholar

58.

E. Willink, M. A. Costilla, and V. M. Osores . 1993a. Daños, pérdidas y nivel de daño económico de Spodoptera frugiperda (Lep., Noctuidae) en maíz. Revista Industrial Agrícola, Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres, Tucumán 70:49–52. Google Scholar

59.

E. Willink, V. M. Osores, and M. A. Costilla . 1993b. El gusano “cogollero”: nivel de daño económico. Avance Agroindustrial (Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Columbres, Tucumán 12:25–26. Google Scholar

60.

T. Ylioja, H. Roininen, M. P. Ayres, M. Rousi, and P. W. Rice . 1999. Host-driven population dynamics in an herbivorous insect. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10735–10740. Google Scholar

61.

R. Zuccardi and G. Fadda . 1985. Bosquejo Agroecológico de la Provincia de Tucumán. Miscelánea Nº 86, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia. 68 pp. Google Scholar

Appendices

Table 1. Frequency and relative importance of the faw parasitoid complex in vipos during the four-year study.

i0015-4040-89-2-175-t01.gif

Table 2. Abundance and percent parsitism of faw parasitoids obtained in Tafí Viejo and Vipos during the four-year study.

i0015-4040-89-2-175-t02.gif
Gabriela Murúa, Jaime Molina-Ochoa, and Carlos Coviella "POPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE FALL ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) AND ITS PARASITOIDS IN NORTHWESTERN ARGENTINA," Florida Entomologist 89(2), 175-182, (1 June 2006). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2006)89[175:PDOTFA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2006
KEYWORDS
corn
parasitoid complex
performance
population fluctuation
Spodoptera frugiperda
Back to Top